Sekai this screenshots say alot different from what you just said in shout! That if the alt clan tried to engrave or whatever you will paralyze and jail their mains! Screens are not altered except the hp/mp/cp and skills! So on this screenshots you say just the oposite what you said before a while!
Especially for GM Sekai
Tue, 03/17/2015 - 18:54
#1
Especially for GM Sekai
Tue, 03/17/2015 - 19:12
#2
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
My point is that you shouldn't be taking all the castles from the server with alternative clans like TR tried to do in the past.
That would just kill the server, and why do you need a castle on a Clan that is not even active? It's just done to take away the castle from other people who plays the game actively.
Cheers,
Sekai.
Tue, 03/17/2015 - 19:14
#3
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
Dont try to avoid what i showed!!!!
Tue, 03/17/2015 - 20:04
#4
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
Wasnt that alt clan taking castle from alt clan xD?
Edit: Dude, for me You showed nothing, it doesn't prove anything, doesn't means anything. Why making a mess ?
Thu, 03/19/2015 - 07:47
#5
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
That is called a diversion!! Who did u fight there ???? A dorf in +0 moirai with a +15 nograde and a kamael of lvl 79 in A grades .... u call that trying to take over the castle ? But when it happened u came running, so I achieved my goals, Aden was set free .... and with Axime i didn't even try to get to the walls, just to let u guys worry we could break thru.
DTK: I don't need to get paralised by the GM, I got common sense, something that is lacking in some it seems. I am not like you guys!
The nice thing is to see you cry to the GM like a baby ... got scared we cought you guys unprepared? Without your tricky setups, no christmas trees and hiding behind NPC guards ... not that I don't know your true face, but you just show it once again for all to see! Have fun guys! :)
AxIME
Thu, 03/19/2015 - 21:12
#6
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
A diversion that wouldnt work if Sekai didnt back you up! If Sekai didnt allow you to take castle with alt clan ( which according to the rules is forbidden ) that diversion wouldnt have worked at all ... About us using tricky setups? Whats wrong with that? We use ingame factors to make strategies .. I dont see anything wrong with that. "Got scared we cought you guys unprepared?" for real your common sense is worse than all. As i pointed up .. if GM didnt allow you to take castle with alt clan there wouldnt be "cought unprepared" or "diversion".. but yeah whatever. The things i wanted to show with the screenshots its that Sekai is getting messed up with his lies. On us before siege he tells us you are allowed to take castle .. and 1 day after eveything passes he says that he spoke with you and told you you will get banned if take rune ... ofc if you had taken Rune he wouldnt have said anything like that since he warned us you are allowed to take the castle.... So yeah i think Sekai here is not acting as a proper GM ( probbably ill get punished by saying that but its my opinnion and he told me to write on forums not ingame so i think i dont have to be punished ). Sekai didnt even bother to explain what he said before siege/ after siege ... the two things he says are totally oposite ... so yeah .. Sekai you gave a totally unrelated answer to what i showed ... you didnt even try to defend yourself .. you just tried to change the topic and not explain yourself and your actions.
Regards
DeathTheKid
Thu, 03/19/2015 - 22:13
#7
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
Thu, 03/19/2015 - 22:21
#8
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
A couple of holes in your conspiracy theory.
First :
Sekai generally asks major clans not to take their advantage in numbers and to take other weaker clans' castles. Sekai was informed we had no intention to take the Ruen castle (as far as I know even the gates were barely touched).
Second : I think it is quite obvious FA are strong enough clan to hold their castle agains a couple of boxes without an extra qq to gm about it. I'm quite certain if you asked GM to para those he'd do that (probably not without a bit of a giggling).
Sekai didnt even bother to explain what he said before siege/ after siege ... the two things he says are totally oposite ... so yeah .. Sekai you gave a totally unrelated answer to what i showed
I'd have to admit this one made me a tiny bit curious, which question exactly, I wonder. If you are making a point, make it clearer than some empty QQ, please.
Fri, 03/20/2015 - 14:26
#9
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
Dodger did you even check the screenshots? I guess not because if you checked them you would know what im talking about! It wasnt a question i just showed Sekai how he says things before siege and says oposite things after the siege! Isnt that strange?
Sekai forbid ALT CLANS to take castles from ACTIVE CLANS and since as i see its not written in the "rules" section he can manipulate the rule the way he fits. Spoke with Muzyk and he said that Astale HAD intention to take RUNE or ADEN ... so here you are wrong.
"I think it is quite obvious FA are strong enough clan to hold their castle agains a couple of boxes without an extra qq to gm about it" - Gm said the same but what if 1 char from that alt clan + whole server Astale/Aequitas/Shinobi or whoever else come to Rune and take it? Ofcourse there wont be any problem because GM allowed that! Yeah we can defend against couple of boxes .. but its hard to help TrapRock and defend Rune from EVERYONe after GM allowed Astale to take Rune with alt clan. As demien dark said it was "diversion" so we cant fully focus and always keep an eye on our castle. And since GM said they are allowed to take it everyone who helped that clan to take Rune wouldnt have been paralyzed ( its common logic ). But Sekai says after the siege (ofc Astale didnt take Rune or anything wrong happened) that he spoke with Astale and told them that he will ban them if they take rune or whatever .. bla bla bla ... noone knows if its true or no .. and noone will know. He left an escape route for whatever the outcome of the sieges are he is not that stupid not to do so....
Dodger you are quite certain that if we asked GM to paralyze them he would do that? Here is second proof that you didnt check the screenshots. Sekai CLEARLY SAID he wont paralyze ANYONE! There is no point asking him when he said something so clearly! So here you are mistaken again.
You ASTALES dont even try to understand how this situation looks to FA you only look it from your point of view without trying to go deep and think how ridicilous it sounds: GM makes a rule that alt clans cant take castles from active clans .. and in some point he says screw that rule because bla bla bla and gives addition to the rule that didnt exist untill now just to make the things sound somehow right. He changes the rule in an instant so Astale can have advantage of it. Why did he have to make additions to the rules? And Dodger its not about what happened .. its about what could have happened. Cuz if Astale and everyone went to rune and take Rune with the alt clan ... everything should be ok and we wouldnt have the right to complain AGAIN as we dont have now because GM allowed it and everything is according to the "rules" ... so yeah try to think how it really looks like. Than write whatever!
Regards
DeathTheKid
Fri, 03/20/2015 - 23:35
#10
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
RUNE or ADEN
Do you want me to give you the Euler circles for "or" and "and" so that you could understand the difference?
But Sekai says after the siege (ofc Astale didnt take Rune or anything wrong happened) that he spoke with Astale and told them that he will ban them if they take rune or whatever .. bla bla bla ...
You've build all this wall of text on a single assumption that all of us are terrible liars and we do not have any evidence, yeah, good job! I think I’ve written it all and I am, unlike someone else, am not gonna copy/paste it yet another time.
Just a thing to consider, if there's a group of people telling that you are wrong on some matter, maybe you should start actually listening instead of assuming the group is full of fools/liars/illuminati?
Stupid me lately thought that enjoying a game is actually playing it, compete, have some nice chat... It appears that putting blames and flame wars is the right way, is it not?
Sat, 03/21/2015 - 17:51
#11
Re: Especially for GM Sekai
Dear DTK,
what if 1 char from that alt clan + whole server Astale/Aequitas/Shinobi or whoever else come to Rune and take it? Ofcourse there wont be any problem because GM allowed that!
He never allowed us to do this. I was warned by him that if we try to make seriuous attempt we will get paralised (SORRY FOR NO SCREENS, NEVER THOUGH THIS WILL START SO MUCH BULLSHITING), so stop the hell telling bullshits about things that didnt even happen. You accused us of trying to get rune after aden when we went there just with 7 semi-buffed peoples for fun?
after GM allowed Astale to take Rune with alt clan.
He never did that, Your screens prove nothing. We didnt take rune, nothing happend and this topic is basically wondering similar to if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.
On the other side, how funny is that like few months ago all TR quit becouse GM DIDNT ALLOWED THEM TO TAKE CASTLE WITH ALT CLAN. Now You all drama about "they "almost" took our clastle with alt clan, lets make tons of nonsense posts about thing that didnt even happen and would not happen...
